Śūnyatā and Brahman: An attempt at reconciliation of conflicting yet complimentary perspectives of nonduality.

In a quest to understand how we grasp reality, we find ourselves questioning the very certainty of our senses. Are they mere conduits of survival, presenting a tailored hallucination of the world rather than an unfiltered truth? This contemplation leads us to discover a reality far more interconnected than our usual distinctions of observer and observed suggest. It’s within this expansive awareness, or consciousness, that we find our perceptions taking shape—albeit as fleeting constructs lacking inherent substance.

At the heart of this exploration is the concept of Brahman from Advaita Vedanta, which posits awareness as the ultimate reality, transcending yet embracing all that exists, both manifest and unmanifest. This pure awareness is not something to be merely observed; it’s to be lived, providing the foundation upon which all perception arises and fades away. Such a viewpoint challenges us to see beyond the physical, to a reality where the notion of separateness is replaced with a profound understanding of emptiness or Śūnyatā—a state not of void but of vibrant interdependence.

This convergence of Brahman and Emptiness does not simplify reality into binary terms but enriches it, revealing a universe where the formless and the form are one and the same. It’s a universe orchestrated by Maya, the cosmic illusion, inviting us to see existence not as a collection of separate entities but as a divine play of consciousness, a testament to the unity that underlies the apparent diversity of life.

To complement the profound exploration of reality, interconnectedness, and the non-dual nature of existence as outlined, incorporating insights from both Hindu and Buddhist texts can offer a rich framework of spiritual understanding. From the Hindu tradition, the Bhagavad Gita provides a comprehensive guide on living and understanding the nature of reality and the self. In contrast, Buddhist texts like the Heart Sutra delve into the concept of emptiness (Śūnyatā) and the interdependence of all phenomena.

“The unreal has no existence; the real never ceases to be. The truth about both has been seen by the seers of the essence of things.”

Chapter 2, Verse 16, Bhagavad Gita

This verse speaks to the nature of reality and illusion, aligning with the concept of Maya in Advaita Vedanta, highlighting the eternal nature of Brahman and the transient nature of the physical world.

“When a person sees the diversity of beings as rooted in the One, and spreading out from it alone, then they attain Brahman.”

Chapter 13, Verse 31, Bhagavad Gita

This emphasizes the interconnectedness of all life and the realization of non-dual awareness, where the distinction between the observer and the observed dissolves into the unity of Brahman.


“Form is emptiness, emptiness also is form. Emptiness is no other than form; form is no other than emptiness.”

Heart Sutra

This foundational statement from the Heart Sutra encapsulates the essence of Śūnyatā, asserting that the material world (form) and the concept of emptiness are not separate but interdependent realities. It echoes the synthesis of Brahman and Emptiness, where form and the formless exist not in opposition but as expressions of the same underlying reality.

“Therefore, in emptiness, there is no form, nor feeling, nor perception, nor impulse, nor consciousness; No eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind; No color, sound, smell, taste, touch, or object of mind; No realm of sight…no realm of consciousness. There is neither ignorance nor extinction of ignorance…nor birth and death, nor extinction of birth and death; No suffering, nor cause or end to suffering, no path, no wisdom and no gain. No gain – thus Bodhisattvas live this Prajna Paramita with no hindrance of mind…”

Heart Sutra

This section of the sutra presents a profound understanding of reality that transcends ordinary perceptions, emphasizing that true enlightenment and freedom are achieved by transcending dualities and acknowledging the fundamental emptiness present in all dualistic phenomena. This concept of emptiness does not contradict but deeply explores the essence of Brahman, offering a nuanced path to self-realization. It encourages a complete dissolution of dualistic and ego-centric views by embracing emptiness, facilitating an awareness of one’s unity with the cosmos and mutual dependence within it.

This understanding is akin to recognizing the Atman (self) as one with Brahman, where identity extends beyond the physical and mental confines, affirming a non-separation from everything, there is no possible way to be seperate as your identity is the fullness that exists through and in your body-mind as well as beyond it. From emptiness’s vantage point, separation is null; everything is inherently interconnected and defined by what it is not—the boundless, eternal backdrop. In Brahman’s view, the myriad experiences and distinctions we encounter are manifestations of Maya (illusion), yet all stem from a singular, underlying essence.

Reality, despite its diversity and dynamism, is ultimately unified. Brahman embodies both the observer and the observed, the experiencer within and beyond us, wearing our identities temporarily in the cosmic drama of interdependent existence. This perspective reveals that not only is the Atman a manifestation of Brahman, but everything is an expression of Brahman, including our individual selves as observed through human consciousness. This universe mirrors a vast mind, with matter as its concentrated thoughts, and Brahman illuminating itself through our experiences. It is the dreamer we are the manifestation of the dream. The dream cannot be seperarate from the dreamer, the dream is not real, the awareness that perpetuates is. The existence of that cosmic awareness is what you are, as the cosmic dream is dependent on it. You simply borrow this life, this body, this form as a witness of it, and this awareness is empty.

Such a synthesis, while bridging philosophical divides, also addresses potential critiques from both Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta traditions. It reassures that recognizing Brahman in the light of Śūnyatā doesn’t compromise its profundity but deepens it, aligning with the Buddhist view that reality surpasses dualistic thinking. Similarly, understanding Emptiness as complementary to Brahman reaffirms the non-dual essence of reality, beyond the simplistic dichotomy of existence and non-existence.

By marrying these insights, we’re not just reconciling philosophical perspectives but also charting a path toward a deeper understanding of reality and, ultimately, liberation. This journey invites us to engage with spiritual practice in a way that transcends mere intellectual understanding, aiming instead for the direct realization of the interconnectedness of all life manifested. It’s a call to celebrate the complementary nature of Śūnyatā and Brahman, advocating for a holistic approach to spirituality that honors the myriad paths leading to the realization of non-dual awareness, self-realization and egoic was.

Leave a comment